|
The
Water Should Be Pure As Possible, and Safe for ALL to Drink!
Any Objections? © |
|
To Guarantee peace of mind, security, health, freedom and assurance of Safe
Water for ALL people.© |
Proposal
for:
~A
Bill for a LAW~
To Guarantee peace of mind, security, health, freedom and assurance of Safe
Water for ALL people.
Be it known to all:
water is essential to all and the water supply should be safe for all to
drink; and Whereas individuals vary in their susceptibility and responses to
various substances as well as in the amounts of water they consume; and
Whereas alternative methods of delivery for all substances exist; and
Whereas each individual possesses the inalienable right to choose or reject what
he or she consumes;
Therefore be it known from this day forth:
The public or private water supply(s) shall never be used to deliver any
product, substance, device, element, medicine or preventative agent with the
intent or for the purpose of affecting the physical or mental functions of the
body of any person consuming such
water.
under penalty of pain and imprisonment.
Citizens for Safe Drinking Water-Hawaii
P.O.Box 1198
Kekaha HI
96752
Dec. 15th 2002
Anniversary day of our Bill of Rights
Testimony of Chiyome L. Fukino, M.D.
Director of Health
February 25, 2003
Purpose: Prohibits the addition of any product, substance, or chemical to
the public water supply for the purpose of treating or affecting the physical or
mental functions of the body of any person. It specifically exempts
military water systems that fluoridate their water supplies as well as chemicals
needed to make water safe to drink.
Department's Position: The Department of Health does not feel that this is
the time to enter into a debate on the merits of fluoridation. While the
State Administration has no position at this time and has no plans to pursue a
community water fluoridation initiative, we oppose this proposal.
Thank you for the opportunity to testify on this
measure.
Elected Officials and Agency Directors must Stop
Domestic Terrorism: Pass SB 1038 SD1 2006 SB-15 SD-1
I WANT PEACE AND SECURITY FOR YOU NOW! By knowing that
neither my Family nor I will be drugged via the water supply, for any purpose!
Not with Viagra, Fluoride or
Aspirin!
Citizens for Safe Drinking Water-Hawaii, www.gjne.com/cfsdwh
Request your assistance to help protect ALL people of Hawaii by
Doing your part; help PASS SB 1038 SD1, Now!
IT IS ONLY COMMON SENSE!
To
Guarantee peace of mind, security, health, freedom and assurance of Safe Water
for ALL people.©
In tumultuous times as now, recently we have/are being told it is only terrorist
who want to cause us harm, drug and poison our water!
I am far more concerned by this tiny minority of politicians and civilians who
insist on acting like tyrants, over and over threatening me, my family, and the
public at large, (“we will drug your water-you will accept it, harmful effects
included.”) than I am with this other hoax and fear mongering, that I must
give up my American Rights to be protected from the other terrorist!
The Water Should Be Pure as Possible, and Safe for ALL to Drink! Any Objections?
The masses, the majority- EXPECT their water to be water.
Now and in the future, from the beginning of time, water.
Only a minority, less than a majority, in fact a tiny minority of confused
people and civil servants continue to force themselves and their beliefs upon
us, and continue maliciously to impose their illogical indefensible argument;
this one being: that the water
should be poisoned and used to drug you.
Medically it is malpractice, randomly distributing drugs without diagnoses
and prescription or Dose specific to the individual.
This minority of politicians who vote against pure water and continue to
threaten us with drugging us by our water supply will be memorialized and
strongly remembered for the upcoming elections. It remains highly probable -at
least 18,000 others and still increasing, including myself will no longer
tolerate your failure to protect (my/our rights) and serve!
That is why SB 1038 SD1, Needs to be passed unanimously this coming week on its
final third reading by the House of Representatives, and Signed into Law by our
Governor, to protect ALL people from being Drugged via the Water Supply!
It is only common sense! IT IS
COMMON SENSE!
The people, and groups in Hawaii have collected say, 18,000 plus signatures
(serenely) in support of their Legislature and Governor making in known to ALL,
that the water will not be used to drug people by friend or foe without the
penalty of pain and imprisonment to foreign or domestic persons.
PASSING SB 1038 SD1 will do just that.
Support your Senators, Representatives and Governor, who support you, your
family, and your precious water.
www.gjne.com/cfsdwh
Kind Regards, Greg1
Citizens for Safe Drinking Water- Hawaii
P.O.Box 1198 Kekaha, HI 96752 808-337-2211
E/mail h-2-o-@gjne.com remove hyphens
NO-SPAM*
Replying to Star Bulletin Title: Fast-track
fluoridation ban nearing Lingle's desk
<http://starbulletin.com/2003/02/27/news/index3.html>
NOTHING underhanded was done to introduce this and other bills to protect our
water supply.
Perhaps if the pro-fluoride people were one
of the many people with impaired immune systems who would become dreadfully ill
if fluoride or ANY chemical were added to the water, then they would FULLY
understand.
Some of these chemicals cannot
be filtered but, even if they could, it would condemn us to staying at home like
prisoners.
Fluoride has been put in NYC
and Boston water systems for years and their cavity rates are as bad as ours.
I, personally, grew up in a
community that valued pure water and nothing was ever added.
I have NEVER had any dental
problems.
If you do your homework you will see
it is dental hygiene that prevents cavities, not fluoride.
Our Senate and Representatives are aware there are many citizens who would
become ill if chemicals are added to the water. Why would anyone prevent us from
living normal, healthy lives?
I cannot believe anyone would be so callous as to do this to us.
Bobby McClintock, Honolulu
Letter from Michael Connett to Governor Lingle.
<gov@hawaii.gov>
Dear Governor Lingle,
Please sign SB 1038 SD1 into law.
Here's why:
Despite what fluoridation proponents may say, the facts clearly show that Hawaii's
dental health is one of the best in the nation. According to the Centers for
Disease Control, Hawaii has the LOWEST rate of tooth loss in the entire
country. Not one state in the entire country has a lower rate of tooth loss than
Hawaii. See:
http://www2.cdc.gov/nohss/ListV.asp?qkey=4
Moreover, according to the oral health report cards issued by Oral Health
America,
"Connecticut, Hawaii, Iowa, and Utah scored the highest grade"
among all 50 states for oral health. See: http://www.oralhealthamerica.org/pr06.htm
If fluoridation proponents were correct, Hawaii - being the least fluoridated
state in the country - should have some of the worst dental health in the land.
This is simply not the case.
Hawaii's experience is similar to that of western Europe. Despite the fact that
98% of western Europe has rejected water fluoridation, their dental health is
just as good, if not better, than the dental health of the USA. See: http://www.fluoridealert.org/govt-statements.htm
Hawaii does not need water fluoridation. There are many better, more effective
things Hawaii can do with its money than pour it down the drain with this
outdated and crude policy.
As noted by the recent Nobel Laureate in Medicine, Dr. Arvid Carlsson:
"I am quite convinced that water fluoridation, in a not-too-distant future,
will be consigned to medical history."
Shortly after Carlsson wrote this, his home country of Sweden banned water
fluoridation. Hawaii should do the same.
Please support SB 1038 SD1!
Sincerely,
Michael Connett
Web Manager
Fluoride Action Network
http://www.fluoridealert.org
INTERNATIONAL FLUORIDE INFORMATION NETWORK
www.fluoridealert.org
New_York>IFIN BULLETIN: IFIN # 743: Hawaii needs our help.
New_York>February 28, 2003
Dear All,
Hawaii has some of the most exotic scenery in the world, as well as some of the
cleanest water. It is also the only state in the US which has never been
fluoridated (except for the military bases) and has some of the lowest tooth
decay in the country. In the letter from Michael Connett below, he writes:
"Despite what fluoridation proponents may say, the facts clearly show that Hawaii's
dental health is one of the best in the nation. According to the Centers for
Disease Control, Hawaii has the LOWEST rate of tooth loss in the entire
country. Not one state in the entire country has a lower rate of tooth loss than
Hawaii. See: http://www2.cdc.gov/nohss/ListV.asp?qkey=4
However, the State Health Department has a Dental Director who is fanatically pro-fluoridation ( he is very close to Michael Easley, so you can just imagine
what rubbish he is being fed). Year after year the pro-fluoridation forces keep
trying to fluoridate Hawaii and each year the stalwart fighters against
fluoridation fend them off. Now fluoridation opponents appear to be close to
turning the tables on the pros. They are very close to getting a bill passed in
the House (it has already passed in the Senate). This bill states that "no
person shall place additives into the public water supply to treat or affect the
physical or mental functions of the body of any person, rather than to make
water safe or potable." You can imagine that the pro forces are going crazy
and mounting all the pressure they can muster to prevent a) this bill passing
the house and then b) pressuring the Governor to veto to the bill. We need
letters to offset this pressure.
Below, we have printed three things:
1) An article in yesterday's Honolulu paper about the bill.
2) An appeal from activist Greg Norby asking for letters to the Governor Little
and others.
3) Michael Connett's letter to the Governor.
I hope you will send your letters into the Governor and some of the
Representatives for whom Greg has given the email addresses.
Paul Connett.
_____________________________________________________________________
1) Story in yesterday's Honolulu Star Bulletin. 030227
http://starbulletin.com/2003/02/27/news/index3.html
Thursday, February 27, 2003
Fast-track fluoridation ban nearing Lingle's desk
The measure has been approved by the Senate and a House committee
By Pat Omandam
<pomandam@starbulletin.com>
In an unusual move, the state Legislature is only two votes away from ending the
decades-long debate over fluoridation.
Although fluoridation has been a hotly debated issue since the 1950s, Senate
Bill 1038, SD1, which would ban additives in Hawaii's drinking water, has
quietly and quickly passed the Senate and a House committee this month.
The bill with a vague title was heard by the Legislature's two water committees
but not the key health panels and requires no other public hearings. All it
needs is two affirmative floor votes from the 51-member House, and then it goes
directly to Gov. Linda Lingle for consideration.
"Basically, we're saying: 'Don't tamper with Hawaii's water. It's pure,
it's healthy and leave it alone,'" said state Rep. Cynthia Thielen (R,
Kailua-Kaneohe). "And that's what the bill said on its fast track to the
governor," said Thielen, a member of the House Water, Land and Hawaiian
Affairs Committee, which approved the measure on Tuesday.
State Sen. Les Ihara Jr. (D, Kahala-Palolo), who has spoken out in the past
about good government practices and ethics, said the bill "kind of popped
out" on the legislative fast track. He said it should have been reviewed by
both Health committees, given the controversial subject, and it is unfair to
those respective chairmen -- and the public -- that it was not.
"The democratic process is designed and meant to be fair, and the
unfairness of it affects the level of confidence people have in the
process," Ihara said yesterday. "They can't trust the process. If they
can't trust they'll be dealt with fairly, then that damages the image and the
level of trust for the institution," he said. Ihara was the only one to
vote with reservations on Feb. 13 when all 25 senators agreed to send the bill
to the House.
Advocates say adding fluoride to the water supply would improve the dental
hygiene of Hawaii's children, who have one of the nation's highest rates of
tooth decay. Hawaii is among 10 states where less than half of residents drink
fluoridated water.
The bill, titled "Relating to Water Supply," states no person shall
place additives into the public water supply to "treat or affect the
physical or mental functions of the body of any person, rather than to make
water safe or potable."
Federally operated water systems, like those on military bases, are exempt from
this bill. While the measure may have slipped by fluoridation advocates,
opponents have submitted ample testimony specifically praising it for ending the
fluoridation push once and for all. And many lawmakers agree with them.
Senate Water, Land and Agriculture Chairwoman Lorraine Inouye (D, Hilo-Honokaa),
in her committee report, said the bill would "free Hawaii from periodic
threats of mandatory community fluoridation, which have been occurring since the
1950s."
State Sen. Sam Slom (R, Diamond Head-Hawaii Kai), who introduced the measure,
said there have been increasing proposals to put things in the public water
supply, and his intention was to put an end to all of them, not just
fluoridation.
Senate Health Chairwoman Rosalyn Baker (D, Honokohau-Makena) said she probably
would not have heard the bill if it was sent to her committee. She acknowledged
it is a divisive issue and believes the counties should decide it since they are
the ones that control the water supply.
House Health Chairman Dennis Arakaki (D, Kalihi Valley), who had advocated for
fluoridation in the past, said the Legislature should not preclude itself from
considering it in the future. Arakaki said he would have appreciated the measure
being assigned to his committee and is uncertain of what he will do when it
comes up for a vote on the House floor.
House Vice Speaker Sylvia Luke (D, Dowsett Highlands-Punchbowl) explained
yesterday the bill was sent to only one committee because it is House majority
policy to assign crossover bills to the same subject committees that heard it in
the Senate. It is the responsibility of committee chairmen like Arakaki to
"catch these things" and ask these bills be assigned to their
committees, she said.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Request from Kauai1
"Out of state supporters".
Citizens for Safe Drinking Water-Hawaii
Please send your support of SB 1038 SD1 to
1) Rep. Calvin Say (Speaker of the House) at <repsay@Capitol.hawaii.gov>.
2) Rep. Sylvia Luke (Vice Speaker of the House) at <repluke@Capitol.hawaii.gov>.
3) Governor Linda Lingle at <gov@hawaii.gov>
Greg suggests you stress that you love to travel to Hawaii, or would love
sometime to come to Hawaii, but you will think twice about it if you have to
drink fluoridated water!
ACCURACY The newspaper should
guard against inaccuracies, carelessness, bias
or distortion through emphasis, omission or technological manipulation. It
should acknowledge substantive errors and correct them promptly
and prominently.
Hi Pat,
Starbulletin.com pomandam@starbulletin.com
I am responding to your "Fast-track fluoridation ban nearing Lingle's
desk" article.
First, let me suggest that you would have better served the public if you had
reported that a long overdue bill to keep unnecessary substances out of Hawaii's
drinking water is nearing Governor Lingle's desk.
Senate Bill SB1038SD1is not a health bill, it is a water bill to help keep our
water as pure as we can keep it. This is why it was appropriately to send
it to the water committees.
Yes, along with any other substance to treat people through the public drinking
water, the addition of fluoride will be prohibited. The people of Hawaii,
including the legislators who have voted for this bill, do not want to be
medicated through the public drinking water.
This bill did not "kind of popped out" as Senator Ihara claims.
The delegate at the 2002 Hawaii Democratic Party convention passed the following
resolution to support such legislation.
"NOW
BE IT RESOLVED that the Democratic Party of Hawaii supports a policy of safe
drinking water and will work toward legislation to prohibit the addition of any
chemicals (except for water safety), treatment, drugs or nutrients to any water
supply providing water to the general public. Any chemical proposed
to be added to the water to make it safe for drinking: shall require that the
issues of testing, safety and effectiveness be resolved by the Food and Drug
Administration with a joint agreement published by the EPA
Headquarters Professionals' Union (National Treasury Employees Union, Chapter
280) prior to addition to any drinking water supply providing water to the
general public."
Although your article may mislead some, by the suggestions that the bill is a
bill to ban fluoridation, it does inform the public that a bill is proceeding
through the legislature to prohibit adding substances to our water to treat or
affect the physical or mental functions of our bodies, which of course many of
your readers will understand includes fluoride. I thank you for that.
Senator Baker's indication that had the bill been referred to her health
committee, it would have probably died there, lends supports for the Speaker's
decision to refer the bill to the Water, Land Use & Hawaiian Affairs
Committee, the appropriate committee.
I hope you will take my comments as attempts to be helpful, as intended.
Aloha,
Bob Briggs
Kailua
To:
pomandam@starbulletin.com
Hi.. I fould your article regarding SB 1038 a little off base. It is most
definitely not an anti-fluoridation bill. It is a pure water bill.
I very clearly pointed that out in my testimony. It is a bill that would allow
chemicals to be added to the water only to keep it fit for consumption. Chlorine
is such a chemicaql. It keeps the water fit to drink by killing of impurities,
bacteria, etc. Aspirin, Viagra, Prozac, fluoride, birth control formulas all are
specifically designed to treat a particular ailment (for lack of a better word)
and SB 1038 was specifically created to not treat an ailment. Besides, if a
medication were added to the water supply, how would you control the dose? If a
medication were added to the water supply, would you, who may not suffer from
the ailment the medication would treat, want to lose your freedom of choice and
be forced to ingest something that you did not want or need? With regard to
fluoride, if the CDC says in their Weekly Morbidity and Mortality Report of
August 17, 2001, "...that fluoride's predominant effect is posteruptive
(meaning after the tooth comes into the mouth) and topical (meaning that it
works on the surface of the tooth), why would anyone have to drink it? And if we
were meant to ingest it, why are there poison warning notices concerning
swallowing it on fluoridated toothpaste? If you are interested in
objectivity and truth, why not contact me and let's do an interview and present
that to the people?
Hesh Goldstein
"Health Talk" moderator, K-108 Radio, Honolulu
Dear Editor,
This is in response to your articles regarding Senate Bill
1038, SD-1 which calls for prohibiting chemical additives in the drinking
water for medical or dental reasons in order to treat the body and not the
water. As the citizen who requested this bill, I find your articles
despicable and full of innuendos and false accusations. Although
this bill was requested on behalf of many people and does prevent
fluoridation, as a diabetic who drinks a lot of water, I assure you that
my sincerest intent is support keeping our water as pure
as possible. I have given testimonies against fluoridation in
previous sessions but I have made it clear that I am a pure water
proponent. Your opinions and statements made in the articles have
no substance based on the following:
1. Your article claimed that the bill had a
"vague title." Our group, Citizens for Safe Drinking Water,
had no say in the title, since it was probably assigned by the Legislative
Reference Bureau personnel who drafted the bill. In fact, I would have
preferred the title used in the Democratic Party convention resolution which
called it "Resolution for Protection of Hawaii's Pure Water."
2. Your article claimed that the bill "quietly
and quickly passed the senate." Like any other bill, including
pro-fluoridation bills in the three previous years, this bill gave legal
notice as required by law. How quiet was it? The Department of
Health had representatives at all hearings. Also, ask the hundreds of
delegates at the Democratic Party Convention held last June and the
incumbents who attended, who passed the resolution. This was no
"big secret" since the resolution clearly sought legislation to
prohibit chemical additives from the drinking water to treat people.
This means, do not use the water for dispensing medication such as aspirin, Ritalin, blood pressure medication, blood sugar medication and the countless
number of things considered good for a select group of people. If you
use the Dept of Health reasoning, you would add blood sugar medication before
fluoridation since there are close to 100,000 people with diabetes compared to
the few thousand children with cavities. Long-term costs for diabetics
far exceed the cost of dental problems.
3. Your article claimed it was unfair, the public has a
right to a debate, and it would affect the public trust in the system.
The only true unfairness is that the many bills opposing or banning
fluoridation that have been prepared were not given the opportunity to be
heard. Only bills to fluoridate have been heard in the previous three
sessions. To prove my point, for this session, House Bills 177
and 1481 and Senate Bill 451 were assigned to Health Committees and
were not given opportunity for a hearing, which is typical for
Health Committees in the past and present. As far as the public's right
to a debate, I believe over 50 years of debate on the pros and cons of
fluoridation is enough. Newer information each year only makes
fluoridation worse than what it was made out to be. In regards to the
public trust, my trust in the process has been restored since we followed the
rules in introducing legislation as citizens. It is using your newspaper
to paint a bleak picture, but not the whole truth, that makes me have feelings
of mistrust in the system.
4. Your article claimed that it should have been
heard by both Health Committees. I disagree since the bill only calls
for protection of a natural resource which we are entitled to as stated in the
Hawaii Constitution. It only maintains the status quo of our
drinking water and would not affect the health of the people except to
maintain or improve it if the water is kept as pure as possible.
Remember, I believe this is one of the reasons why Hawaii is the Healthy
State.
5. Your article quotes the fantastic benefits of water
fluoridation, probably given to you by the proponents. This type of
one-sided reporting is poor journalism when belief is based on titles and
organization intimidation with little research. Although my testimony
for this session focused primarily on how important pure water is for our
people and future generations, I have done extensive research on water
fluoridation chemicals. It does not take much rocket science to figure
out that adding an industrial grade toxin containing higher amounts of heavy
metal impurities such as arsenic and lead with poor quality controls than
pharmaceutical grade, will harm and not help people with fragile immune
systems over the long-term, with some people being more vulnerable than
others. I have no objections to individuals who want to ingest or use
the many alternative fluoride products to prevent tooth decay. That is
their choice and they have the ability to stop should they develop chemical
sensitivity.
To the State Senators (all 25) who unanimously passed Senate
Bill 1038 in support of protecting Hawaii's pure water that you insulted by
your articles, I give my special thanks for doing your homework and having the
courage for doing the right thing for the people of Hawaii. To the
Star-Bulletin, I give your paper the opportunity to show fairness and
objectivity. I challenge members of your staff to look at websites www.fluoridealert.org,
www.slweb.org, or the federal government's
own MEDLINE and search for "fluoride toxicity" or "fluoride
poisoning," etc. An alternative to doing your own thorough
research is to sit down to about a 1-1/2 hour presentation of
information on the adverse side of water fluoridation chemicals,
which several senators and representatives did to come to their
conclusion. Included will be Center for Disease Control
data showing Hawaii with the lowest rate of false teeth for people
over 65 (in spite of the alleged claim of having the worst cavities in
the country), why we have the extremely lowest chronic joint problem rate in
the country, how X-rays affect calcium fluoride deposited in our bones by
making it electrically charged, the root causes of tooth decay in Hawaii which
fluoridation will not correct, and alternative ways to fix the problem without
medicating the water system.
If this letter is too long to print in your paper, perhaps
your competitor will if they too will dare to seek the truth.
Mahalo,
Adrian Chang
DO NOT ACCEPT ANY DRUG YOUR WATER CHLORINE
(Pres. Bush committee says so) IS BAD ENOUGH! Change to less toxic
water purification.
ARE YOU A PRISONER OF WAR?