WEB TV VERSION
Arguments Against Water Fluoridation
from the National Academy of Sciences
The following quoted material is taken from the Institute of Medicine's On-Line DIETARY REFERENCE INTAKES at www.nap.edu/books/0309063507/html/288.html
 
Simple answers are provided for the following questions:

"Fluoride is the ionic form of fluorine, a halogen and the most electronegative of the elements of the periodic table. It is ubiquitous in nature."

top

"80 percent or more is typically absorbed. ... The elimination of absorbed fluoride occurs almost exclusively via the kidneys. ... For healthy, young, or middle-aged adults, approximately 50 percent of absorbed fluoride is retained by uptake in calcified tissues, and 50 percent is excreted in the urine. For young children, as much as 80 percent can be retained owing to increased uptake by the developing skeleton and teeth. Such data are not available for persons in the later years of life. ... Under most dietary conditions, fluoride balance is positive. Whether it is positive or negative appears to be due to the blood-bone fluoride steady state. When chronic intake is insufficient to maintain or gradually increase plasma concentrations, fluoride excretion by infants and adults can exceed the amounts ingested due to mobilization from calcified tissues."

top

"The cariostatic action of fluoride on erupted teeth of children and adults is due to its effects on the metabolism of bacteria in dental plaque and on the dynamics of enamel de- and remineralization during an acidogenic challenge. Plaque fluoride concentrations are directly related to the fluoride concentrations in and frequencies of exposure to water, beverages, foods, and dental products. Fluoride can be deposited in plaque by direct uptake from these sources as well as from the saliva and gingival crevicular fluid after ingestion and absorption from the gastrointestinal tract. Its effects on plaque bacteria involve inhibition of several enzymes, which limits the uptake of glucose and thus reduces the amount of acid produced and secreted into the extracellular plaque fluid. These effects attenuate the pH drop in plaque fluid that would otherwise occur and, hence, the severity of the acidic challenge to the enamel."

  • If the fluoride from all these sources works just as well in preventing cavities, and works in exactly the same way ... and fluoride is "ubiquitous," then why should it be added to drinking water?

top

"In a study of fluoride intake by 225 children aged 2 to 10 years, Pang et al. (1992) reported that total fluid intake ranged from 970 to 1,240 ml/day. Consumption of soft drinks, juices, tea, and other beverages accounted for more than 50 percent of fluid intake and ranged from 585 to 756 mg/day. The fluoride concentrations ranged from nondetectable to 6.7 mg/liter."

  • NAS/NRC has commented more than once that during the years prior to 1945, water was virtually the only source of ingested fluoride. The typical U.S. diet provided about one quarter milligram of fluoride daily.
     
  • Not long ago a petition appeared in the Federal Register for an increase in the allowances for fluoride in pesticide residues on fruits and vegetables. According to this document, "EPA has estimated previously that levels of fluoride in/on food from the agricultural use of cryolite plus fluoride levels in U.S. drinking water supplies results in a daily dietary intake of fluoride of approximately 0.095 mg/kg/day." Federal Register: August 7, 1997
     
  • According to McClure, the only reference cited in Dietary Reference Intakes, adults ingested 0.02 mg/kg/day in an "optimally fluoridated area" during the 1940s. For a 70 kilogram man (154 pounds) that's 1.4 mg/day. Now, it appears to be 6.65 mg/day ... far more than the original "optimum" daily intake for maximum benefits and minimum risk.
     
  • In 1993 NAS/NRC commented on evidence that excess fluoride may be responsible for increased dental decay in some areas. More recently, the head of preventive dentistry at the University of Toronto, Dr. Hardy Limeback, a former pro-fluoridationist, said that in his practice, and among his colleagues, cosmetic dentistry is taking more time than dental decay ... and more money.
     
  • For a discussion of the Surgeon General's role in promoting fluoridation, see The Cover-up at the U.S.E.P.A. in Applying the NAEP Code of Ethics to the Environmental Protection Agency and the Fluoride in Drinking Water Standard, written by EPA scientist witnesses.
     

top

"Both the inter-community transport of foods and beverages and the use of fluoridated dental products have blurred the historical difference in the prevalence of dental caries between communities with and without water fluoridation. ... The overall difference in caries prevalence between fluoridated and nonfluoridated regions in the United States was 18 percent ..."

  • At the same time, according to NAS/NRC, the milder forms of dental fluorosis are common in both fluoridated and non fluoridated communities ... in one city mentioned by NAS/NRC in 1993, the rate was reported to be eight times higher than was reported in 1942.
     

top

According to (Dean 1942) ... "reduction in the number of dental caries per child was nearly maximal in communities having water fluoride concentrations close to 1.0 mg/liter. This is how 1.0 mg/liter became the 'optimal' concentration."

top

"Although the total amount of fluoride ingested daily by older children and adults is greater than by infants or young children, it is generally lower when expressed in terms of body weight. As noted earlier, average dietary fluoride intakes by adults living in fluoridated communities have ranged from 1.4 to 3.4 mg/day, or from 0.02 to 0.05 mg/kg/day for a 70 kg person."

  • During the 1940s, according to the only reference cited here, it was 0.05 mg/kg/day for children age 1-3 ... 0.04 mg/kg/day for children aged 4-9 ... 0.03 mg/kg/day for children aged 10-12 ... and 0.02 mg/kg/day for adults.
     
    The 1.4 figure above refers to the dosage delivered in optimally fluoridated areas during the 1940s. The other figure refers to a study published in 1974.
     
  • The DRI uses the figure 0.05 mg/kg/day, which applies to fluoride intake at age 1-3 in 1943. However, only a portion of McClure's data is shown in the DRI table ... leaving out the intake figures for older children and adults. The incorrect use of the 0.05 mg/kg/day figure has resulted in an incorrect 3 to 4 mg/day "adequate intake" for everyone age 19 and over. This error is the foundation for the DRI's new "AI" for fluoride.
     
    Ironically, according to the only reference they cite regarding the tolerable upper limit for safety, even smaller daily doses of fluoride – 0.04 mg/kg/day – could result in phase 3 skeletal fluorosis after 55 to 96 years. (Roholm: 0.2 to 0.35 mg/kg/day resulted in phase 3 crippling skeletal fluorosis after 11 years ... NAS/NRC 1977: "a retention of 2 mg/day would mean that an average individual would experience skeletal fluorosis after 40 yr")
     

top

"The primary adverse effects associated with chronic, excess fluoride intake are enamel and skeletal fluorosis."

top

"Stage 1 skeletal fluorosis is characterized by occasional stiffness or pain in joints and some osteosclerosis of the pelvis and vertebra."

"The clinical signs of stages 2 and 3, which may be crippling, may include dose-related calcification of ligaments, osteosclerosis, exostoses, possibly osteoporosis of long bones, muscle wasting, and neurological defects due to hypercalcification of vertebra."

"The development of skeletal fluorosis and its severity is directly related to the level and duration of exposure."

top

"Crippling skeletal fluorosis continues to be extremely rare in the United States (only 5 cases have been confirmed during the last 35 years), even though for many generations there have been communities with drinking water fluoride concentrations in excess of those that have resulted in the condition in other countries. This puzzling geographic distribution has usually been attributed to unidentified metabolic or dietary factors that rendered the skeleton more or less susceptible."

  • No studies on the long-term arthritic effects of fluoride have been published in which the researchers used appropriate methods, but failed to find evidence of harm. Please read the symptoms of phase 1, 2, and 3 skeletal fluorosis above. Are there more than 5 cases? Not being fatal or contagious, skeletal fluorosis is not a "reportable" disease. That does not mean it does not exist in the United States.
     

top

"Studies are needed to define the effects of metabolic and environmental variables on the absorption, excretion, retention, and biological effects of fluoride."

  • Do we have the right to refuse to participate in medical experiments? Does the government have the right to use our children in medical experiments?
     
  • If so, how do we avoid fluoride in foods, beverages, etc.?
     
  • Keep in mind that when the Dietary Reference Intakes was released during a press conference in the early fall of 1997, a representative of the American Dental Association read the segment on fluoride, as though he wrote it himself. The man in charge of determining the tolerable upper limit of fluoride is a representative of the American Council on Science and Health ... a tax-exempt group which receives most of its funding from Monsanto and other similar interests. Fluoridation saves billions of dollars for industries with fluoride pollution problems.
     
  • If one were to correct the errors in arithmetic in Dietary Reference Intakes, the material quoted above would not only fail to support a proposal to add more fluoride to our children's or our own diet – it would show clearly that fluoridation can no longer be considered "safe" or "effective."
     

top

Total Daily Fluoride Intake During the 1940s - McClure
Age
(years)
Body­
weight
(kg)
From drinking
water
(mg)
From food
(mg)
Total
(mg)
Average
(mg/kg/day)
1­3
4­6
7­9
10­12
8­16
13­24
16­35
25­54
0.390­0.560
0.520­0.745
0.650­0.930
0.810­1.165
0.027­0.265
0.036­0.360
0.045­0.450
0.056­0.560
0.417­0.825
0.556­1.105
0.695­1.380
0.866­1.725
0.05
0.04
0.04
0.03
19+ 61-76 0.800-1.200 0.200-0.300 1.0-1.5 0.02

top

DRI's version of McClure vs. McClure, 1940s
age weight/lbs weight/kg 0.05 mg/day McClure
1-3 28.66 13 0.65 0.65
4-8 48.50 22 1.1 0.88
9-13 88.18 40 2 1.2
14-18 125.662 57 2.85 1.14
14-18 141.09 64 3.2 1.28
19-70 134.48 61 3.05 1.22
19-70 167.55 76 3.8 1.52

top

Minimum Fluoride Intake Which Causes
Crippling Skeletal Fluorosis Among Healthy Individuals
according to NAS/NRC references
author grand total based on
Roholm 36,525 mg 0.2 mg/kg/day for 11 years (100 lbs)
Hodge 1979 36,525 mg 10 mg/day for 10 years
NAS/NRC 1993 36,525 mg 10 mg/day for 10 years
100 lb person 36,525 mg 2.5 mg/day for 40 years
134 lb woman 48,944 mg 3.35 mg/day for 40 years
168 lb man 61,362 mg 4.2 mg/day for 40 years
 

"Existing data indicate that subsets of the population may be unusually susceptible to the toxic effects of fluoride and its compounds. These populations include the elderly, people with deficiencies of calcium, magnesium, and/or vitamin C, and people with cardiovascular and kidney problems. ... Because fluoride is excreted through the kidney, people with renal insufficiency would have impaired renal clearance of fluoride ... Impaired renal clearance of fluoride has also been found in people with diabetes mellitus and cardiac insufficiency. People over the age of 50 often have decreased renal fluoride clearance. ... This decreased clearance of fluoride may indicate that elderly people are more susceptible to fluoride toxicity. ... Because of the role of calcium in bone formation, calcium deficiency would be expected to increase susceptibility to effects of fluoride." Toxicological Profile for Fluorides, Hydrogen Fluoride, and Fluorine (F), (April 1993), U.S. Dept. Health and Human Services, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, p.112

top

Daily Fluoride Intake Associated With Phase III Skeletal Fluorosis
body
weight
pounds

229
220
210
200
190
180
170
160
150
140
130
120
110
100
minimun
mg/day
11 years

20.7747
19.9582
19.0510
18.1438
17.2366
16.3294
15.4222
14.5151
13.6079
12.7007
11.7935
10.8863
9.9791
9.0719
maximum
mg/day
11 years

36.3558
34.9269
33.3393
31.7517
30.1642
28.5766
26.9890
25.4014
23.8138
22.2262
20.6386
19.0510
17.4634
15.8758
minimum
mg/day
44 years

5.1936
4.9895
4.7627
4.5359
4.3091
4.0823
3.8555
3.6287
3.4019
3.1751
2.9483
2.7215
2.4947
2.2679
maximum
mg/day
44 years

9.0889
8.7317
8.3348
7.9379
7.5410
7.1441
6.7472
6.3503
5.9534
5.5565
5.1596
4.7627
4.3658
3.9689
Drinking Water and Health, Safe Drinking Water Committee, National Academy of Sciences, NAS/NRC, 1977 p. 371-372
Harold C. Hodge, Ph.D., The Safety of Fluoride Tablets or Drops, Continuing Evaluation of the Use of Fluorides, AAAS Symposium, Boulder, CO, Westview Press, 1979, p.254.
Health Effects of Ingested Fluoride, Committee on Toxicology, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commission on Life Sciences, National Research Council, August 1993, p.59
Roholm, Kaj, Fluorine Intoxication: A Clinical-Hygienic Study With a Review of the Literature and Some Experimental Investigations, Translated. by W.E. Calvert., London: H.K. Lewis & Co., Ltd., 1937.
0.2 to 0.35 mg/kg/day for 11 years - data base for Hodge, NAS/NRC

References ...
recommended reading

  1. Fluoridation Facts, American Dental Association.
     
  2. Recommended Dietary Allowances, National Research Council, 1980, 1989.
     
  3. The Safety of Fluoride Tablets or Drops, Harold C. Hodge, Continuing Evaluation of the Use of Fluorides, AAAS Symposium, Boulder, CO, Westview Press, 1979.
     
  4. Ingestion of fluoride and dental caries – quantitative relations based on food and water requirements of children 1 to 12 years old, Frank J. McClure, American Journal Diseases of Children, 66:362, 1943.
     
  5. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee on the Fluoridation of Water Supplies, Division of Medical Sciences, National Research Council, Nov. 29, 1951.
     
  6. The problem of providing optimum fluoride intake for prevention of dental caries, Food and Nutrition Board, Division of Biology and Agriculture, National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council, Pub. #294, November 1953
     
  7. Health Effects of Ingested Fluoride, Subcommittee on Health Effects of Ingested Fluoride, Committee on Toxicology, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commission on Life Sciences, National Research Council, August 1993.
     
  8. Biologic Effects of Atmospheric Pollutants FLUORIDES, Committee on Biologic Effects of Atmospheric Pollutants, Division of Medical Sciences, National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C., 1971 p 214
     
  9. Drinking Water and Health, National Research Council, 1977
     
  10. Fluorides and Human Health, World Health Organization, 1970, pp 32, 239-240.
     
  11. Non Dental Physiological Effects of Trace Quantities of Fluorine, Frank J. McClure, Journal American College of Dentists - 12:50, (1945).
     
  12. Fluoridation of Water, Special report by Bette Hileman, Chemical & Engineering News -August 1, 1988 p 35-36
     
  13. Dietary Fluoride In Different Areas in the United States, Kramer, Osis, Wiatrowski & Spencer, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition - 27:590-594, 1974
     
  14. Toxicological Profile for Fluorides, Hydrogen Fluoride, and Fluorine (F), (April 1993), U.S. Dept. Health and Human Services, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, p.112
     
  15. Endemic Dental Fluorosis or Mottled Enamel, Dean, H. Trendley, Journal American Dental Association, 30:1278, 1943
     
  16. The Fluoride Content of Some Foods and Beverages, Journal of Food Science 31:941, 1966
     
  17. Review of Fluoride Benefits and Risks, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1991

Return to Fraud or Incompetence?